Gender Difference in Language Use: A Review of Phonetic, Lexical, and Discourse Features

Authors

  • Mubdir Shihab Ahmed Asst. Prof. Dr., Open Educational College
  • Karama Hassan Hussain Asst Inst., College of Political College, Al-Mustansiriya University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51699/cajlpc.v7i3.1623

Keywords:

Gender, Language Use, Linguistic Features, Phonetic, Lexical, Discourse

Abstract

Gender represents one of the main branches that sociolinguists focus on. Investigating gender in the current study manifests the number of factors that play a crucial role in using language. The current review inspects gender differences and language use from sociolinguistic perspective. The main focus is on the phonetic, lexical, and discourse differences. The study investigates how gender impacts linguistic behaviour and how it affects communities.  Some modern studies are displayed to show how men and women behave and talk and how they use language.

References

W. Labov, Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell, 2001.

P. Eckert, “The Whole Woman: Sex and Gender Differences in Variation,” Language Variation and Change, p. 253, 1989.

P. Eckert and S. McConnell-Ginet, Language and Gender. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

J. Coates, Women, Men, and Language. London, U.K.: Longman, 1993.

J. Holmes, Women, Men, and Politeness. London, U.K.: Longman, 1995.

R. Lakoff, Language and Woman's Place. New York, NY, USA: Harper & Row, 1975.

D. Tannen, You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York, NY, USA: Ballantine Books, 1990.

P. Eckert, Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell, 2000.

K. Johnson, Acoustic and Auditory Phonetics. Oxford, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.

G. Walker, “Phonetic Variation and Interactional Contingencies in Simultaneous Responses,” Discourse Processes, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 298–324, 2016, doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2015.1056073.

S. Koeser, E. Kuhn, and S. Sczesny, “Gender-Fair Language Triggers Readers' Use of Gender-Fair Forms,” Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2015, doi: 10.1177/0261927X14561119.

D. Nguyen, S. Dogruoz, P. Rose, and F. de Jong, “Computational Sociolinguistics: A Survey,” 2015, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1508.07544.

D. Bamman, J. Eisenstein, and T. Schnoebelen, “Gender Identity and Lexical Variation in Social Media,” Journal of Sociolinguistics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 135–160, 2014.

H. A. Schwartz, J. C. Eichstaedt, M. L. Kern, L. Dziurzynski, S. M. Ramones, M. Agrawal, A. Shah, M. Kosinski, D. Stillwell, M. E. P. Seligman, and L. H. Ungar, “Personality, Gender, and Age in the Language of Social Media: The Open-Vocabulary Approach,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 9, Art. no. e73791, 2013.

D. Hovy, “Demographic Factors Improve Classification Performance,” in Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), Beijing, China, 2015, pp. 752–762.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-18

How to Cite

Ahmed, M. S., & Hussain, K. H. (2026). Gender Difference in Language Use: A Review of Phonetic, Lexical, and Discourse Features. Central Asian Journal of Literature, Philosophy and Culture, 7(3), 544–546. https://doi.org/10.51699/cajlpc.v7i3.1623

Issue

Section

Articles